Added: Jarmar Aten - Date: 05.05.2022 10:32 - Views: 21306 - Clicks: 9020
There was a ificant regional variation in men's and women's familial roles in colonial America. In Puritan New England, a patriarchal conception of family life began to break down as early as the s, whereas in the Chesapeake colonies of Maryland and Virginia, a more patriarchal structure of relationships did not truly emerge until the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Moran, Many Puritan men in the first and second generations aspired to become family patriarchs.
Likening their 'errand in the wilderness' to the ancient Hebrews' 40 years of wandering in the desert, the first generation sought to recreate a hierarchical form of family life that was disintegrating in England itself. These men tended to conceive of the family in dynastic and corporate terms. This stress on family continuity was apparent in their naming patterns, their economic strategies, and their inheritance practices. Compared to other English-speaking people, they were more likely to name their first-born sons after themselves. Viewing the family as a cooperate economic enterprise, they exercised strict control over their children, particularly their sons.
Demographic circumstances that were truly unique made Chesapeake married women patriarchal role attainable. Because of its cold winters and low population density, seventeenth-century New England was perhaps the most healthful region in the world at the time.
After an initial period of high mortality, life expectancy quickly rose to levels comparable to our own. Other demographic circumstances also contributed to a patriarchal conception of men's roles. Husbands tended to be ificantly older than their wives--four or five years older on average--and sought to look older still by wearing white wigs and elaborate waistcoats.
Since virtually all women married between 95 and 98 percentit was a nearly universal experience for a woman to transfer subordination to a father to subordination to a husband without the interruption of a period of relative freedom, which antebellum Americans called girlhood, when young women worked temporarily outside a home Ulrich, Few institutions competed with a father's authority.
Despite laws requiring the establishment of schools, most children were educated informally, and while older children were temporarily put out as servants or apprentices between seven and twelve, most adolescents lived at home under their father's watchful eye.
Available evidence suggests that fathers did indeed play an active role in decisions involving choice of an occupation and courtship and marriage. Yet it is striking how quickly this patriarchal Chesapeake married women frayed. As early as the second or third generation, high rates of fertility and increased geographical mobility began to undermine Chesapeake married women patriarchal order. Fathers no longer had sufficient land to keep sons at home and sons lacked sufficient incentives to stay.
Increased occupational choice and new economic opportunities in seaports and commercial towns drew many young men away from the parental home, undermining patriarchal authority. A separate adolescent subculture, free from adult control, began to emerge, as young men ed militia companies, voluntary associations, and religious groups.
The external controls imposed by churches, courts, and parents on children's sexual behavior all lost effectiveness, a development apparent in a sharp increase in illegitimate births and pre-nuptial pregnancies. Class, regional, ethnic, and religious differences characterized women's and men's familial roles and relationships during the colonial era.
The families created by Quakers in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, were far less authoritarian and patriarchal than those in New England. Not nearly as anxious as the Puritans about 'infant depravity' or 'original sin,' Quakers sought to sustain childhood 'innocence' by raising their children in a warm and nurturing environment. Unlike the New England Puritans, Quakers also emphasized early autonomy for children. They provided daughters with an early dowry and sons with sufficient land to provide a basis for early independence.
Quaker families placed a far greater stress on maternal nurture than did Puritan families Fischer, ; Levy, In the Chesapeake colonies of Maryland and Virginia, in stark contrast to New England, the trend was toward increased paternal authority, not its diminishment. A key reason for this shift was demographic. The further south one looks, the more unbalanced the sex ratio and the higher the death rate.
In New England, the sex ratio was relatively even, with men outing women three to two in the first generation. But in New Netherlands, there Chesapeake married women two men for every one female and the ratio was six to one in the Chesapeake. During the seventeenth century, a high death rate and an unbalanced sex ratio made it impossible to establish the kind of the stable, patriarchal family that took root in New England.
In the Chesapeake region, half of all marriages were broken by death within seven or eight years and half of all children lost their fathers before marrying. Death rates were so high that a parent's remarriage was often dissolved by death before reached adulthood. Under these circumstances, most families in the Chesapeake were highly complex units consisting of a complicated assortments of step-parents, step-children, wards, and half-brothers and sisters. The high death rate contributed to a society which attached relatively more importance to the extended kinship network and less to the nuclear family.
As late as the American Revolution, few men in the southern colonies could be confident of directly passing property to their sons. Between andas the death rate declined, the sex ratio grew more balanced, and marriages survived longer, a more stable set of patriarchal family relationships began to emerge in the Chesapeake colonies.
Yet the nature of patriarchy was quite different in the Chesapeake than in New England.
Outwardly, relations between fathers and children were even more hierarchical than in New England, with many southern sons addressing their father in letters as 'Sir' or 'Dear Sir. But it is also clear that parental indulgence, lax discipline, and early independence characterized many planters' relationships with their offspring. It seems likely that the more indulgent patriarchy of the Chesapeake region was an ironic by-product of slavery, because social control energies were diverted away from their own children to racial control Greven, ; Moran, Marital relations, too, appear to have blended together an odd mixture Chesapeake married women patriarchy and wifely independence.
The age difference between husbands and wives was far greater in the southern colonies than elsewhere. Prior toa man would usually marry in his mids while most women married by The female age of first marriage rose during the eighteenth century, but remained far lower than in the northern colonies. Yet if the age gap discouraged close companionship between spouses, the law extended greater legal and property rights to women than was true in New England.
Puritan lawmakers considered marital unity under the husband a prerequisite of social stability, and eliminated English common law protections that assumed that husbands and wives had separate interests such as separate estates for women, dower interest, prenuptial contracts, and suits in equity. In contrast, in Maryland, South Carolina, and Virginia, where the death rate was higher and widows were more likely to be left with young children, women received greater protections for personal and real property.
It is not a surprise, given these circumstances, that southern marital relations seem to have been more strife-ridden. In a famous incident in Virginia inSarah Harrison disrupted her wedding to Dr. James Blair, the future founder of William and Chesapeake married women College by refusing to promise to obey her husband Fischer, Yet for all the regional differences in familial roles, it seems clear that ideologically and economically, colonial Americans generally attached greater ificance to the father-son relationship than to spousal or mother-child relations.
In all regions, colonial fathers were preoccupied with preserving, transmitting, and increasing the familial patrimony. They not only spent a great deal of time and energy to arranging apprenticeships and monitoring sexual behavior, but also attached far more attention than subsequent parents onto courtship and inheritance Wood, Copyright Digital HistoryChesapeake married women
email: [email protected] - phone:(579) 814-8455 x 5133
Single Chesapeake Members Interested In Married Women Dating